Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-50 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-50
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-50 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | December 2012 | Newer by 53 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-50
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WG-50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-50 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-50.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 300 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $280 |