Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-50 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-50
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-50 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | December 2012 | Newer by 53 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-50
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the WG-50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-50 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-50.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 300 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $280 |