Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and DV150F (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out at a similar time to the DV150F so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the DV150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung DV150F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung DV150F
| XZ-2 iHS | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| DV150F | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung DV150F
| XZ-2 iHS | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the DV150F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and DV150F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and DV150F.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung DV150F will provide greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung DV150F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $150 |