Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47851/478511a8a927c87f7bc64622b7ea2ec44bf09c1b" alt="Samsung HZ15W front Samsung HZ15W front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ15W, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HZ15W (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the HZ15W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ15W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ15W
XZ-2 iHS | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
HZ15W | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ15W
XZ-2 iHS | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ15W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the HZ15W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/695b0/695b0b1fe97eea57e810c4b8ae494561baae5352" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and HZ15W is 85 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67d57/67d57ef2c6d810efe47324a4f617f808489692dd" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and HZ15W.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS contains the bigger sensor which will make getting bokeh easier. The younger XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/330da/330dafec5d5a7ac79bb7f0030d550fdb9c1a70b6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25198/251989bc2c140aa55fd18157eba404f34d3c97f9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ15W |
Also Known as | - | WB550 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 249g (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $450 | $330 |