Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
89 Imaging
64 Features
62 Overall
63
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Released May 2014
- Old Model is Samsung NX2000
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NX3000 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 17 months before the NX3000 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the NX3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung NX3000
XZ-2 iHS | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NX3000 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2014 | December 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX3000
XZ-2 iHS | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has measurements of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the NX3000.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and NX3000 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and NX3000.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung NX3000 will provide extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 370 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $450 | $897 |