Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally Known as WB2000
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TL350 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 2 years later than the TL350 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the TL350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung TL350
XZ-2 iHS | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TL350 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung TL350
XZ-2 iHS | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the TL350.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and TL350 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and TL350.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung TL350 |
Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $400 |