Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front
Portability
67
Imaging
50
Features
50
Overall
50

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Sony A330
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Previous Model is Sony A300
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A330 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A330 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The XZ-2 iHS was released 3 years after the A330 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the A330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A330

 XZ-2 iHS A330 
IntroducedDecember 2012May 2009Newer by 44 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 A330 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A330

 XZ-2 iHS A330 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony A330 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A330 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the A330.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and A330 is 85 and 67 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The picture below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and A330.

Plainly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A330 as a Portrait photography camera
46
focusing manually
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
62
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography info
Sony A330 Street photography info
66
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors (346 grams)
75
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Sony A330 as a Sports photography camera
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery life (340 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
not so great battery life (230 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Sony A330
61
better than average battery life (340 shots)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (346 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
44
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
not so great battery life (230 CIPA)
MP count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Landscape photography with Sony A330
55
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (340 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
54
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
not so great battery life (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Sony A330 as a Vlogging camera
36
relatively wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes microphone jack
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors (346g)
9
lack of video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A330
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Alpha DSLR-A330
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2012-12-18 2009-05-18
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 gr (0.76 lbs) 529 gr (1.17 lbs)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 64
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 22.4
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 11.5
DXO Low light score 216 535
Other
Battery life 340 photos 230 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $450 $545