Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released March 2014
- Old Model is Sony A3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony a3500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and a3500 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 15 months earlier than the a3500 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the a3500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha a3500. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony a3500
| XZ-2 iHS | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| a3500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 | December 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony a3500
| XZ-2 iHS | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony a3500 has proportions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony a3500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the a3500.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and a3500 is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and a3500.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony a3500 will give extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2014-03-21 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 411g (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | 470 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $450 | $398 |