Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
87 Imaging
32 Features
29 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Announced May 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H20, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the H20 (10MP) is pretty close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H20 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years after the H20 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the H20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H20
| XZ-2 iHS | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 | May 2009 | More modern by 44 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| H20 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H20
| XZ-2 iHS | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the H20.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and H20 is 85 and 87 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and H20.
As you can see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $249 |