Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbecb/dbecb4b1e7fb5d4bf01f84896f1c6a31656c1510" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 front"
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Announced May 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H20, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the H20 (10MP) is pretty close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H20 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years after the H20 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the H20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H20
XZ-2 iHS | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
H20 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H20
XZ-2 iHS | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the H20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/987c5/987c594ac8f5c0a74d50ec5ba884c666805d3589" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and H20 is 85 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26af/b26af23e1d8d0e6749b339398d4357eb9e728220" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and H20.
As you can see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd672/dd67284fb922e8af8edc5ed9bf332ec5ee578d4c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f4c9/3f4c957499b1779082e888de6565af90684ef4f0" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H20 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $450 | $249 |