Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Sony H300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
  • 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Overview

Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and H300 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and H300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-2 iHS was announced 14 months before the H300 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the H300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony H300

 XZ-2 iHS H300 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 H300 XZ-2 iHS 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014December 2012More modern by 14 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H300

 XZ-2 iHS H300 
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the H300.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and H300 is 85 and 63 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and H300.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony H300 will give extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography info
Sony H300 Portrait photography info
46
manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
40
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography advice
Sony H300 Street photography advice
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
small sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than others (346 grams)
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than others in class (590g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
Sony H300 Sports photography info
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
50
great zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
good battery pack (350 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography advice
Sony H300 Travel photography advice
61
better than average battery (340 shots)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (346g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
good battery pack (350 shots)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (875mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (590 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
Sony H300 Landscape photography features
55
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
no Timelapse recording
47
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good battery pack (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging information
Sony H300 Vlogging information
36
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes external microphone port
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than others (346g)
24
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f3)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic support
heavier than others in class (590 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony H300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony H300
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-12-18 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz(R)
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 5152 x 3864
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 35 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 25-875mm (35.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Viewfinder resolution - 201 thousand dots
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 8.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 gr (0.76 lb) 590 gr (1.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photographs 350 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $450 $249