Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 months prior to the HX300 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX300
| XZ-2 iHS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| HX300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX300
| XZ-2 iHS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | February 2013 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the HX300.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and HX300 is 85 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and HX300.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX300 will give more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $339 |