Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 months prior to the HX300 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX300
| XZ-2 iHS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| HX300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX300
| XZ-2 iHS | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | February 2013 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the HX300.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and HX300 is 85 and 63 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and HX300.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX300 will give more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $339 |