Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front
Portability
62
Imaging
45
Features
60
Overall
51

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
  • Announced February 2014
  • Superseded the Sony HX300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX400V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX400V (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX400V (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-2 iHS was announced 14 months before the HX400V which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the HX400V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX400V

 XZ-2 iHS HX400V 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 HX400V XZ-2 iHS 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014December 2012Fresher by 14 months
Screen resolution921k920kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX400V

 XZ-2 iHS HX400V 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony HX400V has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX400V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the HX400V.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and HX400V is 85 and 62 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The graphic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and HX400V.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Sony HX400V will result in greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography factors
Sony HX400V Portrait photography factors
46
you can focus manually
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
51
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography advice
Sony HX400V Street photography advice
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (346g)
50
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competitors (660g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
Sony HX400V Sports photography info
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX400V as a Travel photography camera
61
better than average battery pack (340 shots)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
53
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (660 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography details
Sony HX400V Landscape photography details
55
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no Timelapse mode
49
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging factors
Sony HX400V Vlogging factors
36
really wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone jack
does not have selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
29
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external mic jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
heavier than competitors (660g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX400V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX400V
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-12-18 2014-02-12
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 12800 12800
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 8.50 m (ISO Auto)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346g (0.76 pounds) 660g (1.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photographs 300 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $450 $448