Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Launched July 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony T99, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and T99 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years after the T99 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the T99 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony T99
XZ-2 iHS | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
T99 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony T99
XZ-2 iHS | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony T99 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the T99.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and T99 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and T99.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony T99 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $179 |