Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/294c2/294c23a1817af61b0fee4116b018baf35f277353" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Launched July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony T99, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and T99 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years after the T99 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the T99 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony T99
XZ-2 iHS | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
T99 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony T99
XZ-2 iHS | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony T99 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the T99.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6add/a6add02c818904344c5122483a0375122c520842" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and T99 is 85 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78d33/78d336d6644832c3a08579bfa981117b2ac805d1" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and T99.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony T99 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ebf1/5ebf12a484a18e22bd6e75add3d902ee30ca9778" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90bdd/90bddc3917aa704ed70843805f5d2cceea79d242" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony T99 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $179 |