Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced August 2009
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TX1 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TX1 (1/2.4") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 3 years after the TX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony TX1
XZ-2 iHS | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 41 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TX1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony TX1
XZ-2 iHS | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the TX1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and TX1 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and TX1.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $350 |