Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Sony W370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
  • 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony W370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W370 (14MP) is relatively close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W370 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 years after the W370 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the W370 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W370

 XZ-2 iHS W370 
LaunchedDecember 2012January 2010Newer by 36 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 W370 XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W370

 XZ-2 iHS W370 
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony W370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the W370.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and W370 is 85 and 94 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and W370.

Plainly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony W370 will result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Sony W370
46
manual focus
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Street photography with Sony W370
66
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
sensor is small (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (346g)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography highlights
Sony W370 Sports photography highlights
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery (340 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
34
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography advice
Sony W370 Travel photography advice
61
great battery (340 CIPA)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (346 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
58
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography details
Sony W370 Landscape photography details
55
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
37
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Sony W370
36
rather wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external mic support
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competition (346g)
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W370
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-12-18 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 34-238mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.6-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 gr (0.76 lb) 179 gr (0.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-90B NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $450 $230