Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony W370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W370 (14MP) is relatively close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W370 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 years after the W370 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the W370 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W370
XZ-2 iHS | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W370 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W370
XZ-2 iHS | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony W370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the W370.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and W370 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and W370.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony W370 will result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.6-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $450 | $230 |