Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2b9/0b2b9e5026839779353343b9b8b0958f8ff8257e" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony W370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W370 (14MP) is relatively close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W370 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 2 years after the W370 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the W370 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W370
XZ-2 iHS | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
W370 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W370
XZ-2 iHS | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony W370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the W370.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a02b/6a02bc65e8d2fcf5715eed9c1049d8ec64a15c74" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and W370 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b7e4/1b7e4b2bb28114e09a4bdb36d7b68c30b8531d10" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and W370.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony W370 will result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5149a/5149ae5634dfc6b6dbd25590dbd2db7f7b00090b" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7410/b74103eac6f75a83be69d8d6d763dc1e46670776" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W370 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.6-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $450 | $230 |