Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Revealed February 2013
- New Model is Sony WX350
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WX300 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 2 months before the WX300 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the WX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony WX300
XZ-2 iHS | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WX300 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX300
XZ-2 iHS | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2013 | Similar generation | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WX300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WX300 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and WX300.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony WX300 will give more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 166g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $330 |