Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WX50 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WX50 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-2 iHS was released 11 months after the WX50 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the WX50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony WX50
XZ-2 iHS | WX50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | January 2012 | Newer by 11 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WX50 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony WX50
XZ-2 iHS | WX50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony WX50 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the WX50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WX50 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WX50.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Sony WX50 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony WX50 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 117 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 240 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $250 |