Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d5a/92d5aaf7d395530441c4baf1340786d20e9e4aff" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ad4/26ad408e09a190dab4a1204a32d9674f2ed6ea5e" alt="Samsung NX500 front Samsung NX500 front"
87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Introduced February 2018
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Panasonic GX9 versus Samsung NX500, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the GX9 (20MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the GX9 (Four Thirds) and NX500 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The GX9 was announced 3 years after the NX500 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GX9 scores vs the NX500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 & Samsung NX500. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic GX9 Gallery & Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Samsung NX500
GX9 | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2015 | Newer by 37 months |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1036k | Crisper screen (+204k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Panasonic GX9
NX500 | GX9 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic GX9 and Samsung NX500
GX9 | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic GX9 offers external measurements of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") and a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Samsung NX500 has dimensions of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic GX9 versus Samsung NX500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GX9 vs the NX500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e08e3/e08e380cc0f0afa7fe11635ce8ecb488ffb1a35e" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 size comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GX9 and NX500 is 82 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42584/42584b56c665c30e9a9bcd593dfbf2eae1bdf6e3" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 top view buttons comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The pic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GX9 and NX500.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GX9 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX500 will resolve extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher GX9 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d71b/9d71baddc48f566fe1669e5d133d9503900afb42" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 sensor size comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ac33/6ac33c9d8899ef4004f9d873092d5d84b183ea9c" alt="Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic GX9 vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | Samsung NX500 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2018-02-13 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6480 x 4320 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,240 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | H.265 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 407 gr (0.90 lb) | 287 gr (0.63 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 87 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | 370 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $1,000 | $800 |