Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX550
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic FX580, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and FX580 (12MP) and the ZS200 (1") and FX580 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ZS200 was brought out 9 years after the FX580 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the ZS200 grades versus the FX580 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery and Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Panasonic FX580
ZS200 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2009 | More modern by 111 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Panasonic ZS200
FX580 | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic FX580
ZS200 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZS200 has outside dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Panasonic FX580 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZS200 and Panasonic FX580 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the ZS200 and the FX580.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the ZS200 and FX580 is 86 and 95 respectively.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS200 and FX580.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The ZS200 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will produce more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern ZS200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS200 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,240 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $800 | $499 |