Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58


70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Additionally Known as WB5000

Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the ZS200 (1") and HZ25W (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.

The ZS200 was launched 7 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the ZS200 matches up against the HZ25W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Samsung HZ25W
ZS200 | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 93 months |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Panasonic ZS200
HZ25W | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Samsung HZ25W
ZS200 | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Panasonic ZS200 comes with outer measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the ZS200 and the HZ25W.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the ZS200 and HZ25W is 86 and 70 respectively.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS200 and HZ25W.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The ZS200 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern ZS200 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Samsung HZ25W |
Also referred to as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | WB5000 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2018-02-13 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,240 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 lb) | 428 grams (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $350 |