Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Old Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Refreshed by Sigma DP3 Merrill

Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Panasonic ZS200 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the ZS200 (20MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the ZS200 (1") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) feature different sensor size.

The ZS200 was launched 6 years after the DP2 Merrill which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the ZS200 scores versus the DP2 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS200 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
ZS200 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 74 months |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+320k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Panasonic ZS200
DP2 Merrill | ZS200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS200 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
ZS200 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Panasonic ZS200 provides external measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic ZS200 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the ZS200 against the DP2 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZS200 and DP2 Merrill is 86 and 83 respectively.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS200 and DP2 Merrill.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ZS200 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent ZS200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZS200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Sigma |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Also called as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2018-02-13 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,240k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $800 | $931 |