Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d3b/58d3bced54bef37acbf33e0cc1a92af65eb0c1e4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS16
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Panasonic FH2 and Pentax Q-S1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Panasonic and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the FH2 (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is very comparable but the FH2 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The FH2 was released 4 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FH2 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FH2 grades versus the Q-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH2 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Pentax Q-S1
FH2 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Panasonic FH2
Q-S1 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 43 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH2 and Pentax Q-S1
FH2 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH2 offers outside measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FH2 and Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the FH2 versus the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e08/79e08083168e59a039d4055cbdd6c5cab62495bb" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH2 and Q-S1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb7c/1cb7c0fab1cdd9dfae08098b3707309d8392bdab" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FH2 and Q-S1.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FH2 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic FH2 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged FH2 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81f22/81f2203fa3c22d33e4332078c9c14b07a16c6fc5" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4e50/e4e5013f9d0eefc3da2d551e67e3839185deef47" alt="Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic FH2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS16 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine IV | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lbs) | 203g (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 shots | 250 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $149 | $250 |