Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
93 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f214/4f2145e13d5e8faa7940ed0459e5247133b2a64c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS30
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Lets look much closer at the Panasonic FH20 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FH20 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively well matched but the FH20 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The FH20 was launched 2 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FH20 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the FH20 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FH20 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
FH20 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Panasonic FH20
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | FH20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH20 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
FH20 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | November 2009 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Panasonic FH20 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FH20 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the FH20 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f8b8/1f8b87c94a7540ce59174caf9cd05b579c4ff335" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FH20 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 93 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26fd9/26fd991ba1be0b7f85c0c4d3658fa262ae17db30" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FH20 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FH20 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Panasonic FH20 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2733/c27331bf0ca1ebc5432d8c48f0eaa9e3e0ff562b" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79122/791226cd8f6e4ca82c63d2278e6c88d51ed71cf1" alt="Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Panasonic FH20 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Other name | Lumix DMC-FS30 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 178 grams (0.39 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $179 | $566 |