Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FH22 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FH22 was announced 5 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FH22 matches up against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FH22 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| FH22 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Panasonic FH22
| WG-M1 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 57 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH22 and Ricoh WG-M1
| FH22 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH22 comes with outside dimensions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the FH22 against the WG-M1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FH22 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH22 and WG-M1.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of files but you really should consider the production date of the cameras into account. The older FH22 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Panasonic FH22 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FS33 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 170 gr (0.37 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $2,000 |