Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bfe6/8bfe6a95e0404efc2daeb5daa70aaa6f63f8ea78" alt="Samsung CL80 front Samsung CL80 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Panasonic FH25 and Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Panasonic and Samsung. The resolution of the FH25 (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The FH25 was unveiled 13 months later than the CL80 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the FH25 scores versus the CL80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 & Samsung CL80. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FH25 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Samsung CL80
FH25 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Panasonic FH25
CL80 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic FH25 and Samsung CL80
FH25 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FH25 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FH25 and Samsung CL80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the FH25 versus the CL80.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3f24/f3f24f62a929888ab6007c8ae61caa7a4995e03b" alt="Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the FH25 and CL80 is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ab2a/4ab2abe126ee0a60807ecd6576dae366a9d1ba50" alt="Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The graphic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FH25 and CL80.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Panasonic FH25 to resolve more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer FH25 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a2ac/4a2ac1e6e2cca9cb97b92beb7aca1b8e31edbe74" alt="Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4872/a48726f7d08961e244e5bf153377c6bcbb7df669" alt="Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Panasonic FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Samsung CL80 |
Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FS35 | ST5500 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine VI | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Screen LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $180 | $400 |