Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Panasonic FH27 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the FH27 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FH27 was released 4 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the FH27 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH27 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
FH27 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Panasonic FH27
WG-4 GPS | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH27 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
FH27 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FH27 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Panasonic FH27 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the FH27 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH27 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH27 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of images though you will need to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The older FH27 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FH27 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine VI | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Touch Screen LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $229 | $210 |