Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look closer at the Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the FP1 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FP1 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FP1 scores versus the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FP1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| FP1 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Panasonic FP1
| WG-4 GPS | FP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| FP1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FP1 has got outside dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the FP1 against the WG-4 GPS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FP1 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The picture below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FP1 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged FP1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Panasonic FP1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $153 | $210 |