Clicky

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Panasonic FP1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Following is a in depth comparison of the Panasonic FP1 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the FP1 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FP1 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The FP1 was brought out 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the FP1 scores against the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FP1 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Panasonic FP1

 DP2 Quattro FP1 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2010More modern by 49 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FP1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FP1 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Panasonic FP1 has got physical measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Panasonic FP1 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the FP1 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FP1 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the FP1 and DP2 Quattro.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FP1 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FP1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FP1 Portrait photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography information
20
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
77
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Panasonic FP1 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition in class (151 grams)
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FP1 Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (6.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
47
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Panasonic FP1 Travel photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography information
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (151g)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
53
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FP1 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FP1 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than competition in class (151 grams)
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Panasonic FP1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FP1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Panasonic Sigma
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-06 2014-02-13
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Venus Engine IV TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-140mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 6.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.90 m (Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 151g (0.33 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Price at release $153 $931