Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Panasonic FP2 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the FP2 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FP2 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the FP2 scores vs the WG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FP2 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Ricoh WG-4
| FP2 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Panasonic FP2
| WG-4 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP2 and Ricoh WG-4
| FP2 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FP2 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FP2 and Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the FP2 versus the WG-4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FP2 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The photograph below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FP2 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older FP2 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.90 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $80 | $330 |