Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Panasonic FS25 versus Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the FS25 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FS25 was launched 6 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the FS25 matches up versus the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FS25 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Ricoh WG-4
| FS25 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Panasonic FS25
| WG-4 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2009 | Fresher by 61 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS25 and Ricoh WG-4
| FS25 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Panasonic FS25 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FS25 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the FS25 compared to the WG-4.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS25 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FS25 and WG-4.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older FS25 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic FS25 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-27 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 29-145mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.30 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 148 gr (0.33 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $230 | $330 |