Clicky

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
 
Ricoh CX3 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs

Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released April 2009
Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced June 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Panasonic FS42 versus Ricoh CX3, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FS42 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is very close but the FS42 (1/2.5") and CX3 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The FS42 was manufactured 14 months prior to the CX3 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the FS42 scores vs the CX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Ricoh CX3

 FS42 CX3 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Panasonic FS42

 CX3 FS42 
IntroducedJune 2010April 2009More recent by 14 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Ricoh CX3

 FS42 CX3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FS42 has got external dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the Panasonic FS42 versus Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the FS42 versus the CX3.

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FS42 and CX3.

As you can see, each of these cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The FS42 has the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF tougher. The older FS42 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
26
focusing manually
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Panasonic FS42
Street photography with Ricoh CX3
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
low max ISO (1,000)
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Sports photography camera
16
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect AF
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Travel photography info
Ricoh CX3 Travel photography info
51
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
66
lighter than competition (206g)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography highlights
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
42
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic socket
30
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FS42 and Ricoh CX3
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42Ricoh CX3
General Information
Manufacturer Panasonic Ricoh
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 Ricoh CX3
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-04-17 2010-06-16
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1000 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 33-132mm (4.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.30 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 pounds) 206 grams (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $580 $329