Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Panasonic FS42 versus Ricoh CX3, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FS42 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is very close but the FS42 (1/2.5") and CX3 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FS42 was manufactured 14 months prior to the CX3 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the FS42 scores vs the CX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic FS42 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Ricoh CX3
| FS42 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Panasonic FS42
| CX3 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 | April 2009 | More recent by 14 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Ricoh CX3
| FS42 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FS42 has got external dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FS42 versus Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the FS42 versus the CX3.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FS42 and CX3.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The FS42 has the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF tougher. The older FS42 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-04-17 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 33-132mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $580 | $329 |