Clicky

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and ST95 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The FS42 was announced 21 months prior to the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the FS42 grades vs the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Samsung ST95

 FS42 ST95 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Panasonic FS42

 ST95 FS42 
RevealedJanuary 2011April 2009Newer by 21 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung ST95

 FS42 ST95 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FS42 features physical measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the FS42 versus the ST95.

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FS42 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FS42 and ST95.

Clearly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The FS42 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung ST95 will deliver more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged FS42 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST95 Portrait photography details
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
30
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Panasonic FS42
Street photography with Samsung ST95
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,000)
50
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Sports photography camera
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
megapixel count decent (16MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Travel photography details
Samsung ST95 Travel photography details
51
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fast max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
38
fast max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
27
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FS42 and Samsung ST95
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42Samsung ST95
General Information
Company Panasonic Samsung
Model type Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 Samsung ST95
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-04-17 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1000 -
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 33-132mm (4.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.30 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132g (0.29 pounds) -
Dimensions 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $580 $145