Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017

Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Panasonic FX75 versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The FX75 was announced 8 years before the WG-50 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the FX75 scores versus the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh WG-50
FX75 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Panasonic FX75
WG-50 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 84 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh WG-50
FX75 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX75 offers exterior dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX75 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FX75 versus the WG-50.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and WG-50 is 94 and 91 respectively.

Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The photograph here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FX75 and WG-50.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older FX75 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Alternate name | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-06-01 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine HD II | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 165g (0.36 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $139 | $280 |