Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97595/97595091e04b873f01a3fddd6303aaf9df4a4ff6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX77
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Panasonic FX78 versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FX78 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The FX78 was launched 3 years before the WB35F and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the FX78 scores against the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX78 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Samsung WB35F
FX78 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Panasonic FX78
WB35F | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Panasonic FX78 and Samsung WB35F
FX78 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX78 features exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FX78 versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the FX78 versus the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f921f/f921f2d85849344017db4d437f800efc339bdd63" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FX78 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1872/a18722b97c8867757b46b080982debb860c6a3bd" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FX78 and WB35F.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older FX78 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23324/233248f04a164ad61add82a74f648a04befca33e" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f16a/7f16afdc837592771346d70ace0cb2b8f134fff5" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Samsung WB35F |
Alternate name | Lumix DMC-FX77 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine FHD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $210 | $130 |