Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Successor is Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Panasonic and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the FZ200 (12MP) and XG-1 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FZ200 was released 24 months before the XG-1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FZ200 matches up against the XG-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 & Pentax XG-1. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FZ200 Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Pentax XG-1
FZ200 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Panasonic FZ200
XG-1 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2014 | July 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FZ200 and Pentax XG-1
FZ200 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FZ200 comes with exterior measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) whilst the Pentax XG-1 has measurements of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the FZ200 and the XG-1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the FZ200 and XG-1 is 65 and 66 respectively.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FZ200 and XG-1.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax XG-1 to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FZ200 will be behind in sensor tech.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FZ200 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Pentax XG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Pentax XG-1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-07-18 | 2014-07-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine VII FHD | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312k dot | 200k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.50 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 588g (1.30 pounds) | 567g (1.25 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 37 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 114 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 photos | 240 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LB-060 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $499 | $599 |