Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300
83 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62


86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Announced April 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- Renewed by Samsung NX500

Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Panasonic GX85 versus Samsung NX300, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Panasonic and Samsung. The image resolution of the GX85 (16MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is fairly close but the GX85 (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

The GX85 was manufactured 2 years later than the NX300 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GX85 grades vs the NX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic GX85 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Samsung NX300
GX85 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2016 | ![]() | November 2013 | More recent by 29 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 768k | Clearer display (+272k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Panasonic GX85
NX300 | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Panasonic GX85 and Samsung NX300
GX85 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Panasonic GX85 has got external dimensions of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic GX85 versus Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the GX85 against the NX300.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GX85 and NX300 is 83 and 86 respectively.

Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GX85 and NX300.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GX85 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX300 will render greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent GX85 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic GX85 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | Samsung NX300 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II | - |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-04-05 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4592 x 3448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,764k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.9 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.6 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 662 | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 shots | 330 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $800 | $750 |