Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 117g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the S3 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the S3 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S3 was revealed 18 months after the GR Digital III which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S3 grades against the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic S3 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic S3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| S3 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic S3
| GR Digital III | S3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic S3 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| S3 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic S3 has outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the S3 against the GR Digital III.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S3 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S3 and GR Digital III.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S3 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic S3 will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent S3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic S3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine IV | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $110 | $399 |