Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ1/Panasonic-SZ1-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-WB800F.jpg)
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 131g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Panasonic SZ1 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. The image resolution of the SZ1 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The SZ1 was revealed 12 months prior to the WB800F and they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SZ1 grades against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are available at Panasonic SZ1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ1 over the Samsung WB800F
SZ1 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Panasonic SZ1
WB800F | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic SZ1 and Samsung WB800F
SZ1 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic SZ1 has outside measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic SZ1 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SZ1 compared to the WB800F.
![Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ1-vs-Samsung-WB800F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ1 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
![Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ1-vs-Samsung-WB800F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ1 and WB800F.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images although you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged SZ1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
![Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ1-vs-Samsung-WB800F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-SZ1-vs-Samsung-WB800F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic SZ1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 23 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 131 gr (0.29 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $179 | $300 |