Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT2
- Earlier Model is Panasonic TS1
- Renewed by Panasonic TS3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Pentax. The resolution of the TS2 (14MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TS2 was revealed 24 months prior to the WG-2 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TS2 matches up against the WG-2 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are available at Panasonic TS2 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS2 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| TS2 | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Panasonic TS2
| WG-2 GPS | TS2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic TS2 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
| TS2 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic TS2 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 63mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TS2 versus the WG-2 GPS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TS2 and WG-2 GPS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TS2 and WG-2 GPS.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Pentax WG-2 GPS to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged TS2 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Panasonic TS2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Pentax |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-FT2 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-26 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-128mm (4.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1300 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.10 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 188g (0.41 lbs) | 198g (0.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $350 | $300 |