Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Panasonic ZR3 versus Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ZR3 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ZR3 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the ZR3 grades versus the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic ZR3 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Samsung WB35F
| ZR3 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Panasonic ZR3
| WB35F | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Panasonic ZR3 and Samsung WB35F
| ZR3 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZR3 comes with outer dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Panasonic ZR3 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the ZR3 vs the WB35F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZR3 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ZR3 and WB35F.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged ZR3 will be behind in sensor tech.
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Panasonic ZR3 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-ZX3 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-26 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1300 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $130 |