Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- New Model is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Panasonic ZS35 versus Ricoh CX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ZS35 was manufactured 4 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the ZS35 scores against the CX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 & Ricoh CX1. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Ricoh CX1
| ZS35 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | February 2009 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Panasonic ZS35
| CX1 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Ricoh CX1
| ZS35 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS35 has got external dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Panasonic ZS35 versus Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the ZS35 against the CX1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZS35 and CX1 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS35 and CX1.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS35 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer ZS35 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 21 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $299 |