Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the ZS35 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.

The ZS35 was announced 2 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the ZS35 grades vs the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
ZS35 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 29 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Panasonic ZS35
GR Digital IV | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
ZS35 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic ZS35 provides external dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ZS35 against the GR Digital IV.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the ZS35 and GR Digital IV is 89 and 92 respectively.

Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS35 and GR Digital IV.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The ZS35 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic ZS35 will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer ZS35 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZS35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 21 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $599 |