Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
96 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Launched January 2014
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Panasonic ZS35 and Samsung DV300F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ZS35 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ZS35 was revealed 2 years after the DV300F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the ZS35 grades against the DV300F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 & Samsung DV300F. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Samsung DV300F
| ZS35 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Panasonic ZS35
| DV300F | ZS35 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Samsung DV300F
| ZS35 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS35 provides outer measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic ZS35 and Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the ZS35 and the DV300F.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the ZS35 and DV300F is 89 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the ZS35 and DV300F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs although you need to factor the age of the products into consideration. The newer ZS35 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Samsung DV300F |
| Alternate name | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 21 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $200 |