Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ZS35 was launched 5 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the ZS35 grades vs the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Samsung SL102
ZS35 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | January 2009 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Panasonic ZS35
SL102 | ZS35 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Samsung SL102
ZS35 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS35 provides outer dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the ZS35 against the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the ZS35 and SL102 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The photograph below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS35 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Panasonic ZS35 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger ZS35 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Samsung SL102 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | ES55 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 21 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $130 |