Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
42 Features
58 Overall
48
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS35
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS45
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Photography Glossary Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Panasonic ZS40 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ZS40 (18MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ZS40 was revealed within a month of the WB35F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the ZS40 grades against the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic ZS40 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Samsung WB35F
| ZS40 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Panasonic ZS40
| WB35F | ZS40 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS40 and Samsung WB35F
| ZS40 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | January 2014 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic ZS40 enjoys outside dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Panasonic ZS40 versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the ZS40 against the WB35F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ZS40 and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZS40 and WB35F.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic ZS40 to give extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Panasonic ZS40 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | Samsung WB35F |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ60 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 240g (0.53 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $450 | $130 |