Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L
59 Imaging
65 Features
84 Overall
72
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Pentax K-3
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by companies Pentax and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the K-3 II (24MP) and GX-1L (6MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe K-3 II was launched 9 years later than the GX-1L and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the K-3 II grades versus the GX-1L for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax K-3 II & Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are available at Pentax K-3 II Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 II over the Samsung GX-1L
| K-3 II | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 | February 2006 | Fresher by 112 months | |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 210k | Clearer screen (+827k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Pentax K-3 II
| GX-1L | K-3 II |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax K-3 II and Samsung GX-1L
| K-3 II | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Pentax K-3 II features physical dimensions of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
See the Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the K-3 II vs the GX-1L.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the K-3 II and GX-1L is 59 and 69 respectively.
Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The graphic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the K-3 II and GX-1L.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Pentax K-3 II to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 18MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger K-3 II provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax K-3 II vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Pentax K-3 II | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax K-3 II | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2015-04-23 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Prime III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 6016 x 4000 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 51200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 27 | 5 |
| Cross focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Pentax KAF2 | Pentax KAF |
| Total lenses | 151 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.3 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync (available with dedicated external flash) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 570 grams (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1106 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 720 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Two | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $829 | $0 |