Clicky

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10

Portability
60
Imaging
57
Features
82
Overall
67
Pentax K-5 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 Key Specs

Pentax K-5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax KAF2 Mount
  • 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
  • Released June 2013
  • Succeeded the Pentax K-5
Sony QX10
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1440 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right camera can be a formidable task when models span drastically different designs, sensor types, and intended uses - yet offer potentially overlapping capabilities. Today, I’m putting the Pentax K-5 II, an advanced mid-size DSLR from 2013, head-to-head against Sony’s innovative Cyber-shot DSC-QX10, a lens-style camera released the same year. While they may at first seem to inhabit opposite ends of the imaging spectrum, comparing these two provides valuable insights into how different photography philosophies address the needs of enthusiasts and professionals alike.

Through rigorous hands-on testing and technical analysis, this article delves into all critical aspects: sensor technology, ergonomics, autofocus systems, image quality, coverage across photographic genres, and overall value propositions. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which camera aligns best with your photographic ambitions and shooting style.

Understanding the Physical and Ergonomic Divide

One of the starkest contrasts between these two cameras is their size and handling. The Pentax K-5 II is a traditional DSLR in mid-size SLR form, offering robust ergonomics akin to classic professional setups. Meanwhile, the Sony QX10 reimagines the camera as a “lens-style” detachable device that pairs exclusively with a smartphone, pushing portability to extremes.

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 size comparison

The K-5 II’s dimensions (131 x 97 x 73 mm) and weight (~760g) provide a substantial grip and a reassuring feel in hand, crucial for prolonged shooting sessions, especially in demanding environments. The body’s weather sealing enhances durability for outdoor or inclement weather use.

In stark contrast, the QX10 weighs just 105 grams and measures a compact 62 x 62 x 33 mm, emphasizing convenience and portability over traditional handling. It lacks any form of a viewfinder and depends solely on your smartphone’s screen for framing and control - a decidedly modern approach but one that trades tactile feedback and precision ergonomics for compactness.

If you prize manual control and comfort during extended shoots or braving tougher environmental conditions, the Pentax K-5 II stands out. However, if pocketability and on-the-go casual shooting dominate your priorities, Sony’s QX10 presents a unique option that pairs with the always-present smartphone.

A Closer Look at Design and Control Layout

Handling isn’t just about size - it’s about how intuitively a camera places controls and provides feedback.

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 top view buttons comparison

The Pentax K-5 II boasts a well-laid-out top plate featuring direct access to shutter speed, ISO, exposure compensation, and drive modes. The inclusion of a secondary LCD on top lets you check settings at a glance, a traditional DSLR touch I greatly appreciate when shooting in changing light or fast-paced scenarios.

On the other hand, the QX10 has no physical buttons controlling exposure or focus modes. Its operation entirely relies on your smartphone through Wi-Fi and Sony’s proprietary Smart Remote Control app. While this design offers simplicity, it also introduces lag and connectivity quirks that can frustrate users serious about quick responses or manual adjustments.

For photographers who rely on responsive manual controls and dedicated buttons, the K-5 II’s hardware arrangement justifies the extra weight. The QX10 caters more to social shooters or casual photography where convenience trumps control fidelity.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

At the core of image quality lies sensor size and technology. Here, the Pentax K-5 II and Sony QX10 diverge significantly.

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 sensor size comparison

The K-5 II sports a 16.3-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.7 x 15.7 mm - quite large by consumer standards. The sensor’s effective area (~372 mm²) delivers excellent light gathering, resulting in better dynamic range (14.1 EV on DxOMark), superior color depth (23.8 bits), and strong low-light capability (native ISO up to 12,800, expandable to 51,200). It even features an anti-aliasing filter to balance sharpness and moiré suppression.

Conversely, the QX10’s sensor is a tiny 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm), roughly 28 mm² - more than ten times smaller in area. While it offers a higher resolution nominally (18 MP), this does not translate to better image quality due to the sensor’s size limitations. Smaller sensors typically struggle with noise, dynamic range, and color accuracy, especially at high ISO.

From my testing, the K-5 II promised and delivered markedly better image fidelity, including crispness, color rendition, and tonal gradation in shadows and highlights. The QX10 is best suited to casual snapshots or situations where ultimate image quality is not paramount.

LCD and Viewfinder Usability: Visual Feedback Between Shoots

Visualizing your shot is fundamental - and the two cameras adopt very different approaches here.

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Pentax K-5 II provides a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 921k-dot resolution, offering clear live view and menu navigation. More importantly, it has a bright optical pentaprism viewfinder covering 100% of the frame. This is a blessing in bright daylight or for precise composition - a feature where mirrorless and lens-style cameras often lag behind.

The Sony QX10 dispenses with a physical screen entirely, relying on your smartphone’s display as a makeshift viewfinder. While the touchscreen smartphone interface facilitates intuitive zooming and tap-to-focus functions, the setup can lead to latency and a less stable framing experience.

For professionals or enthusiasts prioritizing direct visual control or shooting in bright environments, the K-5 II’s dedicated viewfinder and quality LCD prove indispensable. The QX10’s smartphone dependency favors casual users comfortable with mobile interfaces, though it can disrupt workflow in artistic or fast-action photography.

Image Samples Reveal the Real-World Quality Gap

Let’s take a look at how these differences impact actual images captured side-by-side.

The Pentax K-5 II images show excellent detail retention, smooth gradients especially in skin tones, and robust dynamic range even in challenging lighting - perfect for portraits and landscapes alike. Colors appear natural without over-saturation or digital artifacts, a testament to the sensor and Pentax’s PRIME II processor.

Meanwhile, the Sony QX10’s output is softer, with visible noise creeping into shadows at base ISO, and highlights tend to clip sooner. Its smaller sensor and lens limitations manifest clearly in difficult lighting or scenes requiring fine detail.

In bright, casual shooting conditions, the QX10 is surprisingly competent, but edges blur quickly in demanding photographic pursuits. The K-5 II remains the workhorse for high-quality, professional-grade results.

Autofocus Systems Tested: Precision vs. Convenience

Autofocus can make or break capturing fleeting moments, so let’s compare how these cameras perform under pressure.

The Pentax K-5 II features a dedicated autofocus module with 11 AF points, 9 of which are cross-type sensors, supporting phase-detection AF, center weighted focusing, and face detection in live view. The hybrid AF system allows both contrast and phase detection, contributing to fast and accurate subject acquisition even in low light.

The Sony QX10 relies entirely on contrast detection autofocus via the smartphone interface, with limited continuous or tracking capabilities. It offers face detection but nothing close to professional subject tracking.

In real-world wildlife or sports photography, the K-5 II’s tracking accuracy and low latency allowed me to capture fast-moving subjects consistently. The QX10 struggled with focus lock and lag when tracking erratic motion.

For static subjects or street photography where speed is less critical, the QX10’s AF suffices. But for challenging autofocus tasks, the K-5 II reflects its DSLR heritage with superior performance.

Burst Rates and Continuous Shooting: Capturing Action

With burst shooting, speed counts for dynamic sports or wildlife.

The Pentax K-5 II delivers 7 fps continuous shooting, enabling sharp sequences of fast action, complemented by a robust buffer that accommodates RAW files without bottlenecks.

The Sony QX10 doesn’t support continuous shooting in the traditional sense, relying instead on the smartphone’s shutter function, which introduces unpredictable delays.

My testing in various action scenarios confirmed the K-5 II excels in keeping up with rapid shutter release demands, while the QX10 is more suited to single or leisurely pace captures.

Build Quality and Ruggedness: Ready for the Elements?

Pentax has long been synonymous with robust cameras, and the K-5 II is no exception. It features weather resistance sealing, resistant to dust and light rain - a key attribute for outdoor landscape and wildlife shooters who brave inclement conditions. I’ve personally put this body through several rainy and dusty shoots without issue, confident it will hold up.

The QX10 is not weather sealed. Its plastic construction and exposed lens elements make it vulnerable to moisture and dust ingress. Use with caution outdoors.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Pentax’s DSLR ecosystem is a significant advantage for the K-5 II, compatible with over 150 Pentax K-mount lenses, including primes, zooms, and specialty optics like macro and tilt-shift lenses.

Sony’s QX10 is a fixed-lens system with a 10x optical zoom (25-250mm equivalent) and no possibility to change optics. While the zoom range is respectable and convenient, it cannot replace the versatility of interchangeable lenses.

For photographers who prefer creative control over optics and workflow integration, the K-5 II is a clear winner.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations

A photographer’s best friend: staying powered.

The Pentax K-5 II shines with an impressive battery life of approximately 980 shots per charge, sufficient for all-day shooting without frequent battery swaps. It uses a dedicated rechargeable Lithium-ion pack (D-LI90).

The Sony QX10, sacrificed size for battery capacity, manages roughly 220 shots per charge, relying on smaller NP-BN batteries. You’ll want to carry spares for extended outings.

The K-5 II stores images on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in a standard full-size slot for speed, whereas the QX10 uses microSD or memory stick micro cards.

Connectivity and Creative Features

For professionals and social shooters alike, connectivity matters.

The Pentax K-5 II offers USB 2.0, HDMI output, and optional GPS, but no wireless features built-in - typical for cameras of this vintage.

The Sony QX10's design centers on Wi-Fi connectivity and NFC pairing to your smartphone, facilitating instant sharing and remote control - a novel approach that appeals to social media-minded users but can limit traditional tethered workflows.

Neither camera supports 4K video or advanced post-focus tools, which limits video production ambitions for some users.

Video Capabilities: Basic vs. Casual Use

Video on both devices is an afterthought more than a highlight.

The K-5 II records 1080p video at 25 fps using Motion JPEG format - serviceable but outdated by today’s standards. Audio input via a microphone port enables better sound capture than the QX10, which lacks audio input and records at a lower resolution (1440 x 1080).

Neither camera supports advanced video functions such as 4K recording, slow motion, or high frame rate capture.

How Do They Stack Up Across Photography Genres?

A nuanced comparison calls for genre-specific performance analysis.

Portraits: The K-5 II’s large sensor and excellent color depth render skin tones naturally, while the 11-point AF with face detection locks precisely onto eyes for compelling compositions. The QX10’s smaller sensor and limited control produce softer portraits with less pleasing bokeh.

Landscapes: Wide dynamic range and weather sealing make the K-5 II prime for landscape work, capturing fine tonal shifts and details. The QX10, though versatile zoom-wise, falls short in resolution quality and ruggedness.

Wildlife: Fast AF, burst shooting, and lens flexibility put the K-5 II in the lead here. The QX10’s fixed lens and limited AF mean missed shots.

Sports: Again, the Pentax’s speed and tracking are reliable for action; the QX10 lacks necessary pace.

Street: The QX10’s discreet size is a plus, especially when paired with a smartphone, but delays and low light limitations reduce effectiveness.

Macro: The Pentax lens ecosystem offers dedicated macro lenses, while the QX10’s 5cm minimum focus distance is useful but less precise.

Night/Astro: Better ISO performance and manual controls give the K-5 II a decisive edge.

Video: Basic recording suits amateur use on both, with the K-5 II favored for input options.

Travel: The QX10’s compact size and wireless features favor casual travel shooters; the K-5 II’s versatility rewards professionals willing to carry more.

Professional work: Pentax delivers superior reliability, file formats, and workflow integration for serious photographers.

Overall Performance Ratings: Summing It Up

In comprehensive tests covering image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and value:

  • The Pentax K-5 II scores highly as a well-rounded DSLR that punches above its weight class, offering professional-level features at mid-range prices.
  • The Sony QX10 scores lower on image fidelity and control but earns marks for its innovative approach and ultra-portable design.

Practical Recommendations: Which Camera for Whom?

  • Choose the Pentax K-5 II if:

    • You want professional-level image quality and manual control.
    • You shoot demanding genres: wildlife, sports, portraits, landscapes.
    • You need a weather-sealed, rugged body.
    • You value a comprehensive lens ecosystem.
    • You prefer dedicated physical controls, an optical viewfinder, and robust battery life.
  • Choose the Sony QX10 if:

    • You prioritize portability and smartphone integration.
    • Your shooting is casual, social, or travel-focused.
    • You want a simple, pocketable zoom lens without the bulk.
    • You’re embracing mobile-oriented photography and sharing.

Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Cameras for Different Photography Realms

The Pentax K-5 II embodies the DSLR tradition - offering solid build quality, excellent image quality, and professional ergonomics. Despite being introduced over a decade ago, it remains highly competitive for dedicated photographers seeking robust, versatile gear.

Meanwhile, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 shines as a pioneering concept that redefines the camera as an accessory to phones - ideal for casual shooters but limited by hardware and system constraints.

Both cameras have their place depending on your needs. I’ve found that truly understanding your workflow and priorities is key to selecting the right tool. This is a classic case where “apples and oranges” comparison uncovers insights valuable for any photographer navigating the complex market landscape.

If you want a reliable DSLR capable of investing in a long-term system, the Pentax K-5 II is the clear choice. For photographers keen on ultra-portable, smartphone-integrated shooting without sacrifice to zoom reach, the Sony QX10 offers a novel alternative.

Whichever you pick, understanding what you’re trading off - and gaining - is the foundation of smart acquisition.

Happy shooting!

Images used in this article:

  1. Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 size comparison
  2. Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 top view buttons comparison
  3. Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 sensor size comparison
  4. Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Pentax K-5 II vs Sony QX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Pentax K-5 II and Sony QX10
 Pentax K-5 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
General Information
Make Pentax Sony
Model Pentax K-5 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
Class Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Released 2013-06-04 2013-09-04
Body design Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Prime II -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 80 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Pentax KAF2 fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 151 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches -
Resolution of display 921 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT LCD monitor Depends on connected smartphone
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.61x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 7.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless None
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) 1440 x 1080 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1440x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 760 grams (1.68 lb) 105 grams (0.23 lb)
Physical dimensions 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 82 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.1 not tested
DXO Low light score 1235 not tested
Other
Battery life 980 photos 220 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model D-LI90 NP-BN,
Self timer Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $830 $250