Pentax K200D vs Sony T99
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45


96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K100D S
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Launched July 2010

Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Pentax K200D and Sony T99, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Pentax and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the K200D (10MP) and T99 (14MP) and the K200D (APS-C) and T99 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

The K200D was announced 22 months prior to the T99 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the K200D grades vs the T99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax K200D and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax K200D Gallery and Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Sony T99
K200D | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Pentax K200D
T99 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | ![]() | September 2008 | Fresher by 22 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax K200D and Sony T99
K200D | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax K200D enjoys external measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs) and the Sony T99 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax K200D and Sony T99 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the K200D versus the T99.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the K200D and T99 is 61 and 96 respectively.

Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the K200D and T99.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The K200D using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony T99 will offer you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older K200D is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Pentax K200D vs Sony T99 Specifications
Pentax K200D | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax K200D | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2008-09-01 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 64 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 561 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $600 | $179 |