Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets look more closely at the Pentax MX-1 versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the MX-1 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very well matched but the MX-1 (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe MX-1 was introduced 3 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the MX-1 matches up against the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax MX-1 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are available at Pentax MX-1 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| MX-1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | June 2010 | More recent by 38 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Pentax MX-1
| HZ35W | MX-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Samsung HZ35W
| MX-1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Pentax MX-1 comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Pentax MX-1 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the MX-1 compared to the HZ35W.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the MX-1 and HZ35W is 84 and 91 respectively.
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the MX-1 and HZ35W.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP but not the same sensor measurements. The MX-1 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The younger MX-1 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Pentax MX-1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax MX-1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-07-01 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with AR coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 391g (0.86 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 208 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-Li-106 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $300 |