Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-1 GPS was launched 17 months prior to the H200 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-1 GPS grades vs the H200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Sony H200
WG-1 GPS | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
H200 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 17 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Sony H200
WG-1 GPS | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-1 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has proportions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-1 GPS versus the H200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-1 GPS and H200 is 93 and 67 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-1 GPS and H200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony H200 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged WG-1 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony H200 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-08-16 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) | 530 gr (1.17 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | 240 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $250 |