Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Updated by Sony HX300
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the WG-1 GPS (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-1 GPS was unveiled 8 months prior to the HX200V which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-1 GPS matches up against the HX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Sony HX200V
WG-1 GPS | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
HX200V | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2012 | August 2011 | Newer by 8 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-1 GPS and Sony HX200V
WG-1 GPS | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-1 GPS enjoys outside dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-1 GPS against the HX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-1 GPS and HX200V is 93 and 66 respectively.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-1 GPS and HX200V.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony HX200V to render more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged WG-1 GPS will be behind in sensor tech.
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 lbs) | 583g (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | 450 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $350 | $480 |